Difference between revisions of "User:Tonisant/Why Open Systems Matter"

From M3P
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added FB link)
(added links to more articles)
Line 6: Line 6:


* [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/27/technology/27friendster.html Friendster to Erase Early Posts and Old Photos] - Jenna Wortham, ''New York Times'', 26 April 2011
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/27/technology/27friendster.html Friendster to Erase Early Posts and Old Photos] - Jenna Wortham, ''New York Times'', 26 April 2011
* [http://gizmodo.com/5878070/google-puts-the-hammer-down-on-three-more-services Google Puts the Hammer Down on Three More Services∂  - ''Gizmodo'', 20 January 2012




Line 17: Line 19:
==See also==
==See also==
* [http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2011/09/29/28869/ Open access policy adopted] - Princeton University
* [http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2011/09/29/28869/ Open access policy adopted] - Princeton University
* [http://www.lisafederer.net/2012/01/research-works-act/ A Threat to Open Access: the Research Works Act]

Revision as of 07:00, 23 January 2012

One of the things that I try to point out when asked why we shouldn't just use Facebook or YouTube instead of the M3P open system for storing text, images, audio, video etc. is that those closed systems are run by commercial entities (a)with different goals than ours, and (b) who will close down one day sooner or later and potentially leave all our content without a home.

Check out the following for some factual basis to this arguments:


And sometimes you can see it coming ahead of time too:


See also