Difference between revisions of "User:Tonisant/Why Open Systems Matter"

From M3P
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Princeton University policy)
(added FB link)
Line 11: Line 11:


* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2011/apr/27/youtube-founders-buy-delicious YouTube Founders Buy Delicious] - ''The Guardian'', 27 April 2011
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2011/apr/27/youtube-founders-buy-delicious YouTube Founders Buy Delicious] - ''The Guardian'', 27 April 2011
* [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/9008525/Facebooks-share-of-UK-social-networking-declines.html Facebook's share of UK social networking declines] - ''The Telegraph'', 11 January 2012


==See also==
==See also==
* [http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2011/09/29/28869/ Open access policy adopted] - Princeton University
* [http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2011/09/29/28869/ Open access policy adopted] - Princeton University

Revision as of 09:40, 13 January 2012

One of the things that I try to point out when asked why we shouldn't just use Facebook or YouTube instead of the M3P open system for storing text, images, audio, video etc. is that those closed systems are run by commercial entities (a)with different goals than ours, and (b) who will close down one day sooner or later and potentially leave all our content without a home.

Check out the following for some factual basis to this arguments:


And sometimes you can see it coming ahead of time too:


See also