Difference between revisions of "User:SteveBorg/Table of Contents"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Ph.D. title'' | ''Ph.D. title'' | ||
''The recovery and preservation of Maltese folk music | ''The recovery and preservation of Maltese folk music'' | ||
and its eventual dissemination through new media'' | ''and its eventual dissemination through new media'' | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
''Certificate of Authorship'' | ''Certificate of Authorship'' | ||
''Acknowledgments'' | ''Acknowledgments'' | ||
''Acronyms'' | ''Acronyms'' | ||
Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
World: Digitization and Preservation.) | World: Digitization and Preservation.) | ||
1.2.1 '' | 1.2.1 ''Cultural management in the construction of ethnicity and national longing'' | ||
1.3 Specialist entities that safeguard IH | 1.3 Specialist entities that safeguard IH | ||
Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
1.4 ''Brief analysis of topic of research'' | 1.4 ''Brief analysis of topic of research'' | ||
(Why Malta? | (Why Malta? Observe cultural vision reports, international strategies to recover and | ||
preserve, Malta as case study, nations that can adopt proposed model.) | |||
Line 43: | Line 42: | ||
KNOWLEDGE AND COMPREHENSION OF Literature Review, Simple Comparision, Discuss | KNOWLEDGE AND COMPREHENSION OF Literature Review, Simple Comparision, Discuss | ||
Existing articles and contributions on musical recovery, preservation and dissemination | |||
read and reviewed. | |||
2.1 The ongoing debate on what to preserve or not (retention schedule re-IH, example Louis | 2.1 The ongoing debate on what to preserve or not (retention schedule re-IH, example Louis | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
support FNAM ) | support FNAM ) | ||
Guze Cassar Pullicino, Gorg Mifsud Chircop, Anna Borg Cardona, Charles Camilleri, Steve | |||
Borg (why is my study important; recovery - identified lacunae, no guardian of previous | |||
works or continuity, no preservation policies and no effective dissemination). | |||
2.3 Preservation'' British Archives, Library of Congress | |||
preservation vrs/or/and archiving | preservation vrs/or/and archiving |
Revision as of 14:55, 8 November 2012
Ph.D. title The recovery and preservation of Maltese folk music and its eventual dissemination through new media
Table of Contents
Certificate of Authorship Acknowledgments Acronyms Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Background, object and significance of the study
1.2 Conventions and treaties on intangible heritage
(UNESCO - convention and definition of IH; Action programmes including The Memory of the World: Digitization and Preservation.)
1.2.1 Cultural management in the construction of ethnicity and national longing
1.3 Specialist entities that safeguard IH
(IASA, ARSC, FIAF and European Union programmes Europeana, TAPE, Dismarc, National legislations, etc...)
1.4 Brief analysis of topic of research
(Why Malta? Observe cultural vision reports, international strategies to recover and preserve, Malta as case study, nations that can adopt proposed model.)
Chapter 2. Literature Review
KNOWLEDGE AND COMPREHENSION OF Literature Review, Simple Comparision, Discuss
Existing articles and contributions on musical recovery, preservation and dissemination read and reviewed.
2.1 The ongoing debate on what to preserve or not (retention schedule re-IH, example Louis
Armstrong Archives: )
2.2 Recovery works by Alan Lomax, Cecil Sharp, Tulla Magrini, Felix Quilici etc. Discuss.
(ensuring longevity of Maltese folk music - what Lomax did and what is being done today to his collection in U.S.)
(Armenian Institute, memory studies Iceland, Lund Centre of Archives. M3P, organization support FNAM )
Guze Cassar Pullicino, Gorg Mifsud Chircop, Anna Borg Cardona, Charles Camilleri, Steve Borg (why is my study important; recovery - identified lacunae, no guardian of previous works or continuity, no preservation policies and no effective dissemination).
2.3 Preservation British Archives, Library of Congress
preservation vrs/or/and archiving
iv) Dissemination - Radio Aragones, Social networks
dissemination pre-media, dissemination in new media technologies, see echo chamber defination in new media)
4. Methodology
ANALYSIS -x'se taghmel u kif se taghmilha,
MINN DAK LI RAJNA, JEKK MA JSIRUX L-ATTIVITAJIET HEKK, SE JFALLU. X'se taghmel
5. Recuperation
i) field works experiences of Alan Lomax, Edward Jones, Cecil Sharp, Tulla Magrini, Felix Quilici, Klemenc etc.
ii) Rebunking the myth that all is lost in the field: the Maltese perspective
iii) the zaqq recordings, vinyl folk releases, ghana reels (on meeting Malta's Lomax)
iv) collecting unknown/released existing material currently dispersed vinyl, reels, cassettes e.g. Toscana folk, ROAS, Bosnia.
6. Preservation
i) recommendations by IASA, FIAF and UNESCO
ii) resources and funding
iiia) case references re codes of pratice: ITMA, Singapore, Slovenia, Caribbean states, National Australian Sound Archives surveys/reports
iiib) Maltese national entities culture policies
analysis and critique of
iva) National Memory Project NAM
ivb) Malta Music Memory Project M3P (as open resource databank and archive)
7. Dissemination
ia) European Union’s Digital Agenda 2020 ib) Europeana Project Radio Aragones (promoter of Aragonese folk)
iia) User-generated content - the Newland-Pratt report
iiia) i Audience engagement - The Wallace report ii Use of social networks - myspace, twitter and facebook
iiib) i contemporary folk event promotion in Malta through social network - ii the KV outreach experiment for April 2012 musico-literary event iii findings of select focus group scheduled Summer 2012 iva) Malta Music Memory Project M3P (as broadcaster)
8. Conclusion
9. Bibliography
Seperate Reading Lists in three sections on:
Recovery, Preservation, Dissemination
Each list has to have related keywords.