Re-collection (exhibition)

From M3P
Revision as of 09:38, 3 December 2018 by Margarida (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Re-collection Ceramic Exhibition''}} '''Re-collection''' is an exhibition of ceramic art by artist Tony Briffa which focuses on the form-function paradigm...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Re-collection is an exhibition of ceramic art by artist Tony Briffa which focuses on the form-function paradigm, and where the artist creates sculptural objects, vessels and wall-hanging pieces that draw symbolic significance from the artist’s local roots in order to translate them into new forms. These in in turn, are extracted and dislodged from their familiar context, and placed in another, which is the one we ultimately perceive.

The resultant works, although resembling everyday, utilitarian articles, are rendered unusable through this hybrid yet somehow dissonant amalgamation. They are distanced from the design artefact to become objects that, in fact, question the very act and purpose of their own creation.[1]

The central concerns on which ceramicist Tony Briffa has founded his most recent work have addressed obsolescence of form and image as opportunity for reusability into new discourse objects, as a reflection on and search for an alternative identity. His core practice has regularly involved a process which disengages the object from its habitual context, and through the reappropriation and reuse of that which is considered outmoded, which has fallen on the wayside, or is frozen in significance through cultural or aesthetic reformation or progress, he rethinks meaning. Obsolescence and reusability therefore become a ploy in order to readdress the purpose and making of a new medium, form or object that although confronting histories and memories, through incongruous alliance give rise to a fascinating cross-breed, which is thrown once more into the dense net of our socio-cultural collective, imbued with a new significance and demanding new intellectual implications.

The process of borrowing in order to contribute new meaning through a recontextualisation of whatever is borrowed has been with us since the early twentieth century, ever since Picasso and Braque appropriated objects from a non-art context into their work and perhaps more forcefully through Duchamp’s readymades. Nevertheless, the practice has been not only evident, but also important to much of the artistic output in the decades to follow, and has also been at the core of such movements as the Surrealists, Pop, Fluxus and Conceptual Art, right up to current artistic practices.

Through a similar postmodernist propensity, Tony Briffa invites us to engage with objects that at face value seem utilitarian and mimic the forms of stools, irons and three-legged tables. He presents us with pots that sacrifice functional stability for playful decoration and kitchen-like tile wall pieces that rekindle the pop collages of such artists as Eduardo Paolozzi or Richard Hamilton syncopated by minimalist backgrounds of pure colour and meandering brushstrokes.

In the table pieces, the artist invites us to renegotiate our experiential knowledge of this object of furniture which normally consists of a smooth slab fixed on legs, through an intervention on scale and firmness of function.

Furthermore, he re-evaluates and forces new meaning by donning it with Re-Collecting identity through Obsolescence and Reusability a skin of truncated magazine photographic cutouts featuring the human eye inside a triangle, all too known symbols of religion and superstition. Such a fusion of disparate elements imbues the table with expansive meaning that stretches the symbolic, historical and physical reference of the object across millennia, latching it to Ħaġar Qim’s sacrificial altar on the one hand while on the other, lluding it to modern design through a generously playful decoration. The image of the eye, also directly referencing Horus’s eye on the Maltese luzzu, is also extended to the irons or sails, objects which stand sturdily upright on three legs. Although complementing the modernist aesthetic of the tables, these artefacts have no utilitarian function and stare at the viewer through their heavily made-up, female eyes.

In further versions of these irons or sails, the artist ‘blinds’ these objects through substituting the images of the eyes with a structure of uniform polka dots, a device of embellishment which surfaced in fashion in the late 1920s and, similar to their use in the more formal wear of the 1950s, gives the objects an air of optimism and playfulness. This conscious intervention changes the meaning of the works and transports them into light-heartedness.

Tony Briffa’s wall panels further strengthen this concern with function and ornament as points of tangible and conceptual departure. These grid-like, nine-square tile arrangements stress visual rhythm and balance, through an unfolding of spatial narrative that requires the viewer to focus on the single tile element as a complete entity, while also considering its value within the overall composition.

In these works, the artist departs from his engagement with the three-dimensional form through a willful negation of physical depth, using solid flat colours and making sure that the photographic cutouts are visually read within the two-dimensional. Contrary to the sculptural works, these panels sustain the original function and purpose of wall tiles presenting the viewer with a dual reading that oscillates between artform and utilitarian object. These works present an intellectual challenge to the surface that bears them, be it within an art gallery or inversely in a domestic setting.

The exhibited works are clear evidence of the artist’s constant juggling with the form-function paradigm. He intentionally upsets the objects’ equilibrium and renders them unusable not only through change in size, but also through a further dissonant amalgamation of form and image, steering the process of evolution of the object into hybridity. The works therefore become far removed from the comfort of the original artefact turning into effigies that in fact question the very act and purpose of their own creation. [2]

Exhibition

External Links

References

1 }}
     | references-column-width 
     | references-column-count references-column-count-{{{1}}} }}
   | {{#if: 
     | references-column-width }} }}" style="{{#if: 
   | {{#iferror: {{#ifexpr: 1 > 1 }}
     | Template:Column-width
     | column-count: {{{1}}}; -moz-column-count: {{{1}}}; -webkit-column-count: {{{1}}}; }}
   | {{#if: 
     | Template:Column-width }} }}">