Difference between revisions of "M3P talk:Community Portal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tonygrimaud (talk | contribs) (started scribbling on this page ... Thinking aloud!) |
(reponse to initial ideas on community building and awarness building) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
At present, the majority of the main contributors are ppl from the rock/pop scene. Other local music scenes include: Jazz, | At present, the majority of the main contributors are ppl from the rock/pop scene. Other local music scenes include: Jazz, għana, classical, opera, pantomime, sacred music... | ||
How do we go about tapping into their circles and convince the main players in the relevant group to become active contributors to M3P? | How do we go about tapping into their circles and convince the main players in the relevant group to become active contributors to M3P? | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:devise some activities/novelties/experiments/experiences to make ppl aware of the work of M3P and entice them to contribute, then look at the outcome to see if/how they worked. | :devise some activities/novelties/experiments/experiences to make ppl aware of the work of M3P and entice them to contribute, then look at the outcome to see if/how they worked. | ||
[[User:Tonygrimaud|Tony Grimaud]]([[Talk:Tonygrimaud|talk]]) 14:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Tonygrimaud|Tony Grimaud]]([[Talk:Tonygrimaud|talk]]) 14:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
::This is definitely a step in the right direction. Thanks for getting us started! Ideally we should proceed with a systematic strategy asap. You've already pointed to three aspects of this systematic strategy, so we should probably keep building on this: | |||
::# '''User-base matters:''' Identifying who is actually already contributing and/or potentially contributing (i.e. low-use registered users) -- there may be extensions to help us do this, such as [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:User_access_extensions the ones listed here] | |||
::# '''Media relations:''' Mike Bugeja and Noel D'Anastas had already started helping out with this. Alex Grech was thinking about using social media networks more too. | |||
::# '''Events/activities:''' [[M3P Jiltaqa' Ma'...]] is one idea in this direction. The [[M3P:Inaugural Conference]] is another. We probably need to think a little more long-term and possibly even in terms of more activities other than these. | |||
::Perhaps Tuesday's meeting with Alex and Mike is a good place to pick this up. It's already (almost) on the agenda anyway. --[[User:Tonisant|Toni Sant]] ([[User talk:Tonisant|talk]]) 17:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:05, 13 November 2010
At present, the majority of the main contributors are ppl from the rock/pop scene. Other local music scenes include: Jazz, għana, classical, opera, pantomime, sacred music...
How do we go about tapping into their circles and convince the main players in the relevant group to become active contributors to M3P? IDEAS:
- more awareness - media: write-ups, interviews, a 'physical' local link that ppl can contact.
- devise some activities/novelties/experiments/experiences to make ppl aware of the work of M3P and entice them to contribute, then look at the outcome to see if/how they worked.
Tony Grimaud(talk) 14:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- This is definitely a step in the right direction. Thanks for getting us started! Ideally we should proceed with a systematic strategy asap. You've already pointed to three aspects of this systematic strategy, so we should probably keep building on this:
- User-base matters: Identifying who is actually already contributing and/or potentially contributing (i.e. low-use registered users) -- there may be extensions to help us do this, such as the ones listed here
- Media relations: Mike Bugeja and Noel D'Anastas had already started helping out with this. Alex Grech was thinking about using social media networks more too.
- Events/activities: M3P Jiltaqa' Ma'... is one idea in this direction. The M3P:Inaugural Conference is another. We probably need to think a little more long-term and possibly even in terms of more activities other than these.
- Perhaps Tuesday's meeting with Alex and Mike is a good place to pick this up. It's already (almost) on the agenda anyway. --Toni Sant (talk) 17:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- This is definitely a step in the right direction. Thanks for getting us started! Ideally we should proceed with a systematic strategy asap. You've already pointed to three aspects of this systematic strategy, so we should probably keep building on this: